Chapter 6 · PGT-mt fundamentals

Interpreting results and understanding limitations

PGT-mt reduces the risk of transmitting mitochondrial disease but does not eliminate it completely. Interpreting a result requires an understanding of what was measured, the basis of published reference values and the remaining uncertainties.

Reading level

Essentials

Ranking, not diagnosis

Embryos with 5% and 80% carry the same pathogenic variant but differ greatly in mutant load and expected risk. PGT-mt is therefore used for ranking: among the available embryos, the embryo with the lowest heteroplasmy level is chosen when no embryo without a detectable pathogenic variant exists (Smeets et al., 2023). The measured percentage describes the biopsy sample; it is not a statement about the health of the future child.

Low heteroplasmy is not a guarantee

Risk is determined by the distribution of mutant mtDNA among the child’s tissues, tissue thresholds and the properties of the pathogenic variant (Burr & Chinnery, 2024). The biopsy sample is analysed once and represents only part of the embryo; available data suggest stable levels across foetal tissues in utero, although the placenta may differ from the foetus (Monnot et al., 2011); after birth, levels in tissues diverge (Burr & Chinnery, 2024).

What 18% and 30% mean

18%
a calculated reference point: in the muscle of carriers of pathogenic point variants, a mutant load of ≤18% corresponded to a ≥95% chance of remaining unaffected; for m.3243A>G the chance was lower (Hellebrekers et al., 2012).
30%
an operational criterion of the Newcastle programme: embryos below 30% were preferred for transfer (Hyslop et al., 2025).

These are answers to different questions, obtained from different tissues, methods and outcomes. Neither is a universal clinical threshold.

Chromosomes matter too

If PGT-A is performed, an embryo with low heteroplasmy and a euploid chromosome complement is selected for transfer. The aneuploidy rate rises with the woman’s age (Volodyaev et al., 2025), so combining PGT-mt with PGT-A may be appropriate at an older maternal age (Spath et al., 2021).

Reading a report: a teaching example

A hypothetical cycle used for illustration: the numbers are not taken from publications. Before the cycle the programme and the family agreed on a cut-off for this variant — 15% in this example; PGT-A was performed on the same trophectoderm biopsy.

Teaching example · hypothetical values

EmbryoHeteroplasmy in the biopsyPGT-AInterpretation
13%euploidbelow the cut-off — first candidate for transfer
2not detected (assay limit of detection: 2%)aneuploidnot transferred because of aneuploidy; “not detected” does not mean 0%
311%euploidbelow the cut-off — second candidate
438%euploidabove the agreed cut-off — usually not transferred
56%mosaicthe decision is discussed separately with the clinical geneticist

The final order of candidates is discussed with the clinical geneticist and the embryologist. Even after transfer of embryo 1, prenatal diagnosis is discussed: the biopsy is a few trophectoderm cells, not the whole embryo (chapter 4).

Limited evidence and publication bias

Published PGT-mt experience consists mainly of single families, small series and a few specialised programmes (Castelluccio et al., 2025; Hyslop et al., 2025). Successful cycles are published more often than unsuccessful ones, and there are no data to correct for this publication bias. Every fully reported cycle — including cycles with no suitable embryo — is therefore valuable for science.

PGT-mt supports embryo selection based on measured heteroplasmy levels and variant-specific evidence, but it is not an absolute guarantee of the birth of a healthy child and does not establish a universal safe heteroplasmy threshold.

Advanced

Why PGT-mt is a quantitative ranking method

In PGT-M, the goal is an embryo without the pathogenic genotype (or with a single allele, depending on the mode of inheritance). In PGT-mt, quantitative heteroplasmy values are compared between embryos of the same cycle. The decision is made relative to the available embryos and the chosen cut-off. A difference of a few percentage points affects the choice only when the measured level lies close to the cut-off; for extreme values (0–5% or a high load) such a correction does not change the decision.

The biopsy and later distribution across tissues

Trophectoderm, chorionic villi, amniocytes, cord and peripheral blood, urinary and buccal epithelium represent different cell populations (Stewart & Chinnery, 2015; Burr & Chinnery, 2024). Agreement is therefore judged not by matching numbers but by whether the clinically relevant range is preserved. For m.8993T>G, transfer of embryos with very low or undetectable heteroplasmy was followed by the birth of children with low or undetectable variant levels (Steffann et al., 2006; Spath et al., 2021). After TE biopsy and transfer of a blastocyst in an m.3243A>G carrier, the variant was not detected in the child’s tested tissues (Heindryckx et al., 2014). After transfer of a blastocyst with 1.8% m.3250T>C, the variant was not detected in cord blood at birth or in blood and buccal epithelium at two years (Hu et al., 2026). After transfer of two embryos with heteroplasmy below 18% for the m.14487T>C mutation, the newborn’s cord blood had an mtDNA heteroplasmy level of approximately 5%. Because two embryos were transferred, it is not possible to determine which one gave rise to the child (Sallevelt et al., 2017b). When embryos with heteroplasmy of about 50–60% (m.8344A>G, m.3697G>A) were transferred, comparable levels were found in the foetus or child (Steffann et al., 2014; Ji et al., 2021). For m.3243A>G, reported blood heteroplasmy levels in one child ranged from less than 10% to 46–47% across analyses performed at different ages and using different methods (Treff et al., 2012; Mitalipov et al., 2014). Neurological and multisystem abnormalities were reported in the child; a link to the variant was not established (Mitalipov et al., 2014).

In the Newcastle programme, PGT resulted in 18 live births; the variant level in blood was known for 10 of the children and ranged from undetectable to 7% (Hyslop et al., 2025). In eight children after single-embryo transfer, the variant was not detected in either the test blastomere or blood (pyrosequencing threshold: 3%) (Hyslop et al., 2025).

The 18% and 30% reference points: origin and scope

  • 18% — the result of a systematic review of mtDNA heteroplasmy levels in muscle tissue for 159 point variants, assuming an a priori probability of being affected of 0.477; it is a probability boundary across variants, and for m.3243A>G the chance of remaining unaffected is significantly lower (Hellebrekers et al., 2012). The reference point was used to estimate which women might benefit from mitochondrial donation (Pickett et al., 2019) and to select embryos in individual cases (Hu et al., 2026).
  • 15–30% — the literature range of the symptomatic threshold for m.3243A>G, used in modelling estimates (Ji et al., 2023).
  • 30% — the operational transfer criterion of the Newcastle programme with single day-3 blastomere biopsy — the only one of these reference points with a published clinical outcome for a series (Hyslop et al., 2025).

A cut-off used for embryo selection serves a different purpose from a tissue-specific biochemical or clinical threshold and may be more conservative: one part is measured at one time point, whereas the load in all tissues over a lifetime is what matters clinically. None of these numbers defines a safe threshold for an individual embryo.

Aneuploidy in the joint interpretation of PGT-mt and PGT-A

Even at a younger reproductive age in a carrier of a pathogenic mtDNA variant, some embryos with low heteroplasmy may be aneuploid or mosaic: in a 33-year-old carrier of m.3250T>C, all six blastocysts were below 18%, but three were aneuploid or mosaic (Hu et al., 2026). The scenario calculation in the PGT-mt × PGT-A model section assumes that heteroplasmy and ploidy are independent. This assumption is unproven: one hypothesis is that reduced mitochondrial function of the oocyte, combined with age-related metabolic changes, increases the risk of chromosome missegregation (Mihalas et al., 2024). Paired heteroplasmy–PGT-A data for each blastocyst have been published only for individual cycles (Spath et al., 2021; Ji et al., 2021; Hu et al., 2026; Tofilo et al., 2026).

Insufficient data and publication bias

  • Embryos in published datasets are not independent: many come from one patient in one cycle, and mtDNA variants are unevenly represented.
  • Embryo–child comparisons include different tissues, time points, methods and laboratories for the same child; there are more measurements than independent clinical observations.
  • Successful outcomes are published more often; there is no systematic correction for this bias. The pooled proportion of low-heteroplasmy embryos therefore cannot be interpreted as an individual risk.

Unsuccessful cycles and complete accounting of embryos

Cycles without a suitable embryo, pregnancy losses and results for non-transferred embryos, immature and unfertilised oocytes and aneuploid blastocysts make it possible to trace the distribution of a variant through oogenesis and early development. Without them, it is impossible to move from describing individual cases to quantitative risk estimation. A useful minimum description of a cycle includes the carrier’s age and tissue levels, the numbers of oocytes and embryos, the biopsy day, the PGT-A result and the heteroplasmy of each embryo, the method (WGA, region, linearity, limit of detection) and the outcome with tissue, age and method (Mavraki et al., 2023). How such data can be shared with the Atlas is described in Contribute data.

This material does not replace a consultation with a clinical geneticist and does not provide an individual prognosis.

From concepts to Atlas data

Chapter references (22)

All DOIs were checked against PubMed records; exceptions are marked at the entry.

  1. Smeets HJM, Sallevelt SCEH, Herbert M (2023). Reproductive options in mitochondrial disease. Handb Clin Neurol 194:207–228. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-821751-1.00004-X · PMID 36813314
  2. Burr SP, Chinnery PF (2024). Origins of tissue and cell-type specificity in mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) disease. Hum Mol Genet 33(R1):R3–R11. doi:10.1093/hmg/ddae059 · PMID 38779777
  3. Monnot S, Gigarel N, Samuels DC, et al. (2011). Segregation of mtDNA throughout human embryofetal development: m.3243A>G as a model system. Hum Mutat 32:116–125. doi:10.1002/humu.21417 · PMID 21120938
  4. Hellebrekers DMEI, Wolfe R, Hendrickx ATM, et al. (2012). PGD and heteroplasmic mitochondrial DNA point mutations: a systematic review estimating the chance of healthy offspring. Hum Reprod Update 18:341–349. doi:10.1093/humupd/dms008 · PMID 22456975
  5. Hyslop LA, Blakely EL, Aushev M, et al. (2025). Mitochondrial donation and preimplantation genetic testing for mtDNA disease. N Engl J Med 393:438–449. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2415539 · PMID 40673696
  6. Volodyaev I, Ivanova A, Korchivaia E, et al. (2025). The chromosomal challenge of human embryos: prevalence of aneuploidy and mosaicism. F S Rev 6:100082. doi:10.1016/j.xfnr.2024.100082 DOI from the publisher PDF; not found in PubMed
  7. Spath K, Babariya D, Konstantinidis M, et al. (2021). Clinical application of sequencing-based methods for parallel preimplantation genetic testing for mitochondrial DNA disease and aneuploidy. Fertil Steril 115:1521–1532. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.01.026 · PMID 33745725
  8. Castelluccio N, Spath K, Li D, et al. (2025). Genetic and reproductive strategies to prevent mitochondrial diseases. Hum Reprod Update 31:269–306. doi:10.1093/humupd/dmaf004 · PMID 40085924
  9. Stewart JB, Chinnery PF (2015). The dynamics of mitochondrial DNA heteroplasmy: implications for human health and disease. Nat Rev Genet 16:530–542. doi:10.1038/nrg3966 · PMID 26281784
  10. Steffann J, Frydman N, Gigarel N, et al. (2006). Analysis of mtDNA variant segregation during early human embryonic development: a tool for successful NARP preimplantation diagnosis. J Med Genet 43:244–247. doi:10.1136/jmg.2005.032326 · PMID 16155197
  11. Heindryckx B, Neupane J, Vandewoestyne M, et al. (2014). Mutation-free baby born from a mitochondrial encephalopathy, lactic acidosis and stroke-like syndrome carrier after blastocyst trophectoderm preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Mitochondrion 18:12–17. doi:10.1016/j.mito.2014.08.005 · PMID 25159128
  12. Hu X, Zhang Y, Wan Z, et al. (2026). Successful live birth after preimplantation genetic testing for combined nuclear RNASEH2C and mitochondrial MT-TL1 variants. J Assist Reprod Genet. doi:10.1007/s10815-026-04041-7 · PMID 42821212
  13. Sallevelt SCEH, Dreesen JCFM, Drüsedau M, et al. (2017b). PGD for the m.14487T>C mitochondrial DNA mutation resulted in the birth of a healthy boy. Hum Reprod 32:698–703. doi:10.1093/humrep/dew356 · PMID 28122886
  14. Steffann J, Gigarel N, Samuels DC, et al. (2014). Data from artificial models of mitochondrial DNA disorders are not always applicable to humans. Cell Rep 7:933–934. doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2014.05.005 · PMID 24856293
  15. Ji D, Li X, Pan J, et al. (2021). Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for a carrier with m.3697G>A mitochondrial DNA mutation. J Assist Reprod Genet 38:3251–3260. doi:10.1007/s10815-021-02354-3 · PMID 34802141
  16. Treff NR, Campos J, Tao X, et al. (2012). Blastocyst preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) of a mitochondrial DNA disorder. Fertil Steril 98:1236–1240. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.07.1119 · PMID 22921075
  17. Mitalipov S, Amato P, Parry S, Falk MJ (2014). Limitations of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for mitochondrial DNA diseases. Cell Rep 7:935–937. doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2014.05.004 · PMID 24856294
  18. Pickett SJ, Blain A, Ng YS, et al. (2019). Mitochondrial donation — which women could benefit?. N Engl J Med 380:1971–1972. doi:10.1056/NEJMc1808565 · PMID 31091381
  19. Ji D, Zhang N, Zou W, et al. (2023). Modeling-based prediction tools for preimplantation genetic testing of mitochondrial DNA diseases: estimating symptomatic thresholds, risk, and chance of success. J Assist Reprod Genet 40:2185–2196. doi:10.1007/s10815-023-02880-2 · PMID 37439868
  20. Mihalas BP, Marston AL, Wu LE, Gilchrist RB (2024). Reproductive Ageing: Metabolic contribution to age-related chromosome missegregation in mammalian oocytes. Reproduction 168:e230510. doi:10.1530/REP-23-0510 · PMID 38718822
  21. Tofilo M, Volodyaev I, Tretiakov E, et al. (2026). Concordant mtDNA heteroplasmy between trophectoderm and inner cell mass supports blastocyst-stage PGT-mt for m.14487T>C. J Assist Reprod Genet. doi:10.1007/s10815-026-04012-y · PMID 42649365
  22. Mavraki E, Labrum R, Sergeant K, et al. (2023). Genetic testing for mitochondrial disease: the United Kingdom best practice guidelines. Eur J Hum Genet 31:148–163. doi:10.1038/s41431-022-01249-w · PMID 36513735

Bibliography →